37 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# A paper about a theory of round atoms
|
|
|
|
In this reposity you will find the most recent attempts of me to
|
|
confirm my instinctive insight that atoms must be round and so
|
|
the force holding together atoms must e
|
|
|
|
|
|
If I am standing on a ball—the Earth—circling another ball—the
|
|
Sun—which itself is circling yet another ball—Sagittarius A—this
|
|
analogy might also hold true if I were standing on a hydrogen atom. I am
|
|
spinning: to my left is the past, to my right is the future. Top is north,
|
|
bottom is south, because I live in the northern hemisphere. Top is good,
|
|
bottom is evil, because I am a christian. My mother (whom I love) was
|
|
a bottom quark and my father a top quark. I can build up my whole reality
|
|
just from the Spin of a ball. So why are we still treating
|
|
spin as a two-dimensional force, giving it angular momentum instead of
|
|
velocity?
|
|
|
|
But if I am a particle, why hasn't anyone asked: What is the centripetal
|
|
force associated with spin? I asked this question to ChatGPT, and this
|
|
is the paper it came up with. It seems obvious because we're already
|
|
calculating it. We call it the strong nuclear force, but perhaps in
|
|
reality, this is quantum gravity.
|
|
|
|
I tried to explain this in a one page paper, then in a five page paper
|
|
then i driftet off into more complexity working together first
|
|
with ChatGPT 4.5 and then with Claude Opus 4. I always felt at the
|
|
steering wheel and we never really hallucinated. We just probably
|
|
went a bit to big and to far. You will find these old attempts under
|
|
the directory old in the repo. The main repository should always
|
|
hold the newest files.
|
|
|
|
Including my custom instructions to the AI I am currently working
|
|
with because in this day and age I would be stupid not to let
|
|
myself be assisted by the best AI I can find. And I want to be
|
|
transparent about it.
|