75 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext
75 lines
3.5 KiB
Plaintext
Spin-Tether Force Framework Project Instructions
|
||
Project Title
|
||
"Atoms as Three-Dimensional Spinning Spheres: A Novel Framework for Understanding Spacetime and Binding Forces"
|
||
Current Version
|
||
v22 (as of May 2025)
|
||
Core Thesis
|
||
The fundamental insight of this work is that current mathematics treats atoms as 2-dimensional objects with angular momentum rather than real 3-dimensional spheres with actual velocity. Since spacetime emerges from the experience of standing on a spinning sphere (like Earth), and since standing on an atom provides no such spacetime reference, we may have a fundamental error in how we conceptualize atomic-scale physics.
|
||
Project Philosophy
|
||
|
||
Primary Focus: The hydrogen atom and atomic scale physics
|
||
Secondary Exploration: Applying the same mathematical framework across all scales (subatomic to cosmic) to see where it leads
|
||
Framing: This is a contribution to scientific discourse and exploration of new research directions, NOT a claim to have solved fundamental physics
|
||
Key Comparison: Include derivation of Coulomb force and compare with our spin-tether approach for hydrogen
|
||
|
||
Technical Framework
|
||
The spin-tether force formula: F = ℏ²s²/(γmr³) + σ(r,M,ρ)
|
||
|
||
Where s = mvr/ℏ (calculated from observables, no free parameters)
|
||
σ is scale, mass, and density-dependent tethering acceleration
|
||
Successfully reproduces hydrogen atom stability and planetary orbits
|
||
Fails for galaxy rotation curves (requires σ values 200× cosmic limits)
|
||
|
||
Key Files (v22)
|
||
|
||
main_header_v22.tex - Document setup, abstract, introduction
|
||
theory_math_v22.tex - Mathematical framework and scale-dependent σ
|
||
examples_v22.tex - Applications from quarks to galaxies
|
||
observations_discussion_v22.tex - Tests, predictions, and discussion
|
||
main_document_v22.tex - Combines all sections
|
||
spin_force_refs_v22.bib - Bibliography
|
||
Supporting images: cluster_analysis_results.png, milky_way_rotation.png, etc.
|
||
|
||
Important Computational Results
|
||
|
||
Open clusters: σ ~ 180×10⁻¹³ m/s² (36× cosmic limit)
|
||
Galaxy rotation: σ ~ 1000×10⁻¹³ m/s² (200× cosmic limit, wrong curve shape)
|
||
Framework cannot replace dark matter but may provide small corrections
|
||
|
||
Philosophical Underpinnings
|
||
|
||
Atoms are 3D "balls" we've been treating as 2D "circles"
|
||
Spacetime emerges from spinning reference frames (standing on Earth)
|
||
Standing on an atom provides no spacetime reference
|
||
This challenges fundamental assumptions about atomic angular momentum
|
||
|
||
Acknowledgements
|
||
|
||
Original inspiration: Caseway's Fast and Furious Bilbo (Labrador Retriever)
|
||
Extensive AI assistance: ChatGPT-4.5 and Claude Opus 4 for formalization
|
||
Author has limited physics/LaTeX background; AI helped bridge intuition to math
|
||
|
||
Revision Guidelines for v23+
|
||
|
||
Refocus abstract on the 2D vs 3D atom insight
|
||
Add section comparing Coulomb force derivation with spin-tether approach
|
||
Emphasize hydrogen atom success as primary result
|
||
Reframe other scales as exploratory "what if" applications
|
||
Reduce grandiosity - position as idea contribution, not theory of everything
|
||
Highlight that standing on atom = no spacetime (fundamental insight)
|
||
|
||
Strategic Considerations
|
||
|
||
Single human author (Andre Heinecke) for credibility
|
||
AI assistance acknowledged but not in authorship
|
||
Focus on testable predictions (Gaia DR4, lunar laser ranging)
|
||
Honest about failures (galaxy rotation curves)
|
||
Position as complementary to, not replacement for, standard physics
|
||
|
||
Next Steps
|
||
|
||
Revise abstract to focus on 2D vs 3D atom insight
|
||
Add detailed Coulomb force comparison section
|
||
Reframe introduction to emphasize atomic scale
|
||
Adjust conclusions to be more modest and exploratory
|