9d9df95b6a
- Split observations_discussion.tex into scientific discussion only * Moved observational tests and predictions to earlier in flow * Kept "What We Have Learned" discussion before philosophy * Removed conclusion, acknowledgments, and references - Created main_footer.tex containing post-philosophy content * Conclusion section with philosophical integration * Acknowledgments * Data and Code Availability * Bibliography commands - Updated main_document.tex compilation order * observations_discussion now comes before philosophical_considerations * main_footer added as final input after philosophy |
||
|---|---|---|
| archive/v21 | ||
| current | ||
| figures | ||
| scripts | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CHANGELOG.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
Atoms are Balls: A Novel Framework for Understanding Atomic Structure
🌟 The Big Idea
What if atoms aren't flat circles but three-dimensional spinning balls?
This repository contains a scientific paper exploring a radical reconceptualization of atomic structure. By treating atoms as 3D spinning spheres rather than 2D mathematical abstractions, we discover that the electromagnetic force emerges naturally from rotational geometry—with stunning numerical agreement across the periodic table.
🔬 Key Results
| Element | Our 3D Model | Coulomb Force | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen | 8.23 × 10⁻⁸ N | 8.24 × 10⁻⁸ N | 99.9% |
| Carbon | 3.20 × 10⁻⁷ N | 3.18 × 10⁻⁷ N | 99.4% |
| Gold | 1.42 × 10⁻⁶ N | 1.41 × 10⁻⁶ N | 99.3% |
Zero free parameters. Pure geometry.
📄 Paper Abstract
Current quantum mechanics treats atoms as two-dimensional systems with abstract angular momentum quantum numbers. But what if atoms are actually three-dimensional spinning spheres—balls, not circles? This simple conceptual shift leads to a profound mathematical result: the electromagnetic force binding electrons to nuclei emerges naturally from 3D rotational geometry, with zero free parameters.
🚀 Quick Start
Read the Paper
cd current/
pdflatex main_document_v23.tex
bibtex main_document_v23
pdflatex main_document_v23.tex
pdflatex main_document_v23.tex
Verify the Mathematics
cd scripts/
python verify_atoms_are_balls.py
📁 Repository Structure
current/- Latest version (v23) of the paperscripts/- Python verification and analysis scriptsfigures/- Generated plots and visualizationsarchive/- Historical versions showing developmentdocs/- Additional documentation
🧮 The Formula
The core insight is that for a 3D spinning atomic "ball":
F = ℏ²s²/(mr³)
where s = mvr/ℏ is calculated from observables. This exactly reproduces Coulomb's law!
🤔 Implications
If correct, this suggests:
- Electromagnetic force IS quantum gravity at 10⁻¹⁰ m scale
- All fundamental forces are the same 3D rotational geometry
- Quantum mechanics needs geometric reinterpretation
- We've been missing something fundamental for 100 years
🐕 Origin Story
This theory emerged from watching a dog run in circles on a leash. Sometimes the deepest insights come from the simplest observations.
👥 Contributors
- Andre Heinecke - Original concept and primary author
- Caseway's Fast and Furious Bilbo - Canine inspiration
- AI Collaborators - ChatGPT-4 and Claude helped formalize the mathematics
📜 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. See LICENSE for details.
🔗 Links
- Repository: https://git.esus.name/esus/spin_paper
- Author: esus@heinecke.or.at
💭 Final Thought
"Sometimes the universe's deepest truths hide behind the simplest questions. Like: Are atoms really flat circles, or are they tiny spinning balls?"
For the full development history and how we arrived at these insights, see CHANGELOG.md