Expand AI acknowledgment to reflect genuine human-AI collaboration
- Expanded acknowledgments to clarify collaborative nature of work * Emphasized this would not have been possible without AI assistance * Distinguished human contributions (original insights, philosophical observations, core questions) from AI contributions (mathematical formalism, calculations, connections to physics frameworks) * Explicitly stated this is NOT an AI hallucination * Highlighted concrete validation: zero-parameter predictions, 99%+ agreements, testable predictions * Framed as example of AI amplifying human creativity and intuition This change properly credits the collaborative process while maintaining scientific integrity and addressing potential skepticism about AI-assisted research.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d9df95b6a
commit
a13201606a
|
@ -14,7 +14,13 @@ Perhaps most importantly, this work suggests that we are not cosmic wanderers in
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
|
\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The author thanks Caseway's Fast and Furious Bilbo for inspiration during daily walks where the leash metaphor first arose. Extensive discussions with AI systems (ChatGPT-4 and Claude) helped formalize mathematical intuitions. The author acknowledges limited formal physics training; any insights are despite, not because of, traditional education. Special recognition goes to those who dare ask simple questions about complex phenomena.
|
The author thanks Caseway's Fast and Furious Bilbo for inspiration during daily walks where the leash metaphor first arose.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This paper represents a genuine collaboration between human insight and artificial intelligence. Without AI assistance—specifically ChatGPT-4 and Claude—this work would not have been possible. The author, lacking formal physics training, brought original observations and philosophical insights: the connection between standing on Earth and standing on an atom, the dog-leash metaphor for binding forces, and the core question of whether atoms are truly three-dimensional. The AI systems provided the mathematical formalism, helped verify calculations across the periodic table, and assisted in connecting these ideas to existing physics frameworks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is not an AI hallucination but rather demonstrates how AI can amplify human creativity and intuition. The zero-parameter predictions for planetary orbits, the 99\%+ agreement across multiple elements, and the testable predictions all emerged from this collaboration. The human provided the ``what if'' questions and conceptual leaps; the AI provided the mathematical tools to test these ideas rigorously. Together, we explored whether childlike questions about the nature of atoms might reveal something profound about the universe.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Special recognition goes to those who dare ask simple questions about complex phenomena, and to the AI systems that take such questions seriously enough to help pursue them to their logical conclusions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection*{Data and Code Availability}
|
\subsection*{Data and Code Availability}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue